Welcome Pratacultural Science,Today is 2025-4-9 Wednesday!
Yuan Li, Yong-liang You, Hai-ming Zhao, Gui-bo Liu, Rui-xin Wu, Jian-zhong Yang. Effect of plant density on agronomic traits and forage quality forSorghum bicolor×S. sudanense[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 11(8): 1686-1693. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0045
Citation: Yuan Li, Yong-liang You, Hai-ming Zhao, Gui-bo Liu, Rui-xin Wu, Jian-zhong Yang. Effect of plant density on agronomic traits and forage quality forSorghum bicolor×S. sudanense[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 11(8): 1686-1693. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0045

Effect of plant density on agronomic traits and forage quality forSorghum bicolor×S. sudanense

More Information
  • Received Date: January 20, 2017
  • Revised Date: April 13, 2017
  • Published Date: August 19, 2017
  • This study aimed to discover the differences in agronomic traits and forage quality at different plant densities of Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense. A field small-plot experiment was conducted in the Haihe lowland plain, in which ‘Jicao 1’ and ‘Jicao 2’ were used for photoperiod insensitivity and photoperiod sensitivity of the experimental material, respectively. These correlative characteristic indexes, including the agronomic traits and forage quality, were analysed at different plant density treatments during the individual stages of heading, flowering, and milk. These results showed that the stem diameters of ‘Jicao 1’ and ‘Jicao 2’ at the low plant density (60 00075 000 plant·ha-1) were significantly higher than the high plant density (300 000375 000 plant·ha-1) from the heading to the milk stage (P<0.05), whereas there was no significant differences in the plant height, leaf number, ratio of stem∶leaf, and dry matter content (P>0.05). There was no significant differences in the dry yield of ‘Jicao 1’ under different treatments (P>0.05), but the content of crude protein and the relative feed value of ‘Jicao 1’ at the 150 000 plant·ha-1 were significantly higher than at 75 000 plant·ha-1 during the milk stage (P<0.05). The hay yield of ‘Jicao 2’ at the 300 000 plant·ha-1 was significantly higher than at 120 000 plant·ha-1 (P<0.05), but there was no significant differences between the treatment of 120 000 plant·ha-1 and other treatments on the content of forage quality for ‘Jicao 2’ during the milk stage. According to the comprehensive analysis, the suitable plant density of the photoperiod insensitive Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense was 150 000 plant·ha-1, and the photoperiod sensitive variety was 120 000 plant·ha-1 when cutting during the milk stage in the Haihe lowland plains.
  • [1]
    Li Y,Zhao H M,Xie N,Liu G B,Xie J X.Effect of planting density and stubble height on production performance of Sorghum bicolor#x000D7;S. sudanense .Acta Agrestia Sinica,2012,20(6):1093-1098.(in Chinese)
    [1]
    李源,赵海明,谢楠,刘贵波,谢俊雪.种植密度和留茬高度对高丹草生产性能的影响.草地学报,2012,20(6):1093-1098.
    [2]
    詹秋文,钱章强.高粱与苏丹草杂种优势利用的研究.作物学报,2004,30(1):73-77.
    [2]
    Zhan Q W,Qian Z Q.Heterosis utilization of hybrid between sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and sudangrass [ Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf].Acta Agronomica Sinica,2004,30(1):73-77.(in Chinese)
    [3]
    Rooney W L,Aydin S.Genetic control of a photoperiod-sensitive response in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.Crop Science,1999,39:397-400.
    [3]
    Feng P,Wen D Y,Sun Q Z.Effect of plant density on yield and quality of silage corn.Pratacultural Science,2011,28(12):2203-2208.(in Chinese)
    [4]
    Chen R Y,Feng Y C,Tang Q L,Rong T Z,Zheng C X.Effect of sowing density on the yield and quality of Yucao No.1.Pratacultural Science,2009,26(6):96-100.(in Chinese)
    [4]
    Packer D J,Rooney W L.High-parent heterosis for biomass yield in photoperiod-sensitive sorghum hybrids.Field Crops Research,2014,167:153-158.
    [5]
    冯鹏,温定英,孙启忠.种植密度对玉米产量及青贮品质的影响.草业科学,2011,28(12):2203-2208.
    [5]
    Zhan Q W,Qian Z Q,Lin P,Li J,Zhao C X,Fang A Y.Study on yield components and density of hybrid between sorghum[ Sorghum bicolor (L.)] and sudangrass[ Sorghum sudanense (Piper)].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2001,17(5):18-20.(in Chinese)
    [6]
    Wang Y,Yu Z J,Zhang Y H,Wang L Y,Liu D S,Ma Y.Influence of density on economic characters of Tiannong Greenfodder Number 1 from hybridization of sorghum-sudan grass.Sugar Crops of China,2005(2):39-41.(in Chinese)
    [6]
    陈柔屹,冯云超,唐祈林,荣廷昭,郑常祥.种植密度对玉草1号产量与品质的影响.草业科学,2009,26(6):96-100.
    [7]
    Mei Y,Ruan P J,Zhao M Y.Effect of different planting density and fertilizing amount on fresh yield of Sorghum bicolor .Guizhou Agricultural Sciences,2010,38(10):77-79.(in Chinese)
    [7]
    Marsalis M A,Angadi S V,Contreras-Govea F E.Dry matter yield and nutritive value of corn,forage sorghum,and BMR forage sorghum at different plant populations and nitrogen rates.Field Crops Research,2010,116(1-2):52-57.
    [8]
    Li Y,Zhao H M,You Y L,Liu G B,Zhai L J,Wu R X.Effects of nitrogen and nhosphate fertilizer application on production performance and forage quality for Sorghum bicolor#x000D7;S. sudanense in Haihe lowland plain.Pratacultural Science,2017,34(2):369-377.(in Chinese)
    [8]
    詹秋文,钱章强,林平,李军,赵彩霞,方爱云.高粱-苏丹草杂交种产量构成因子及最适密度的研究.中国农学通报,2001,17(5):18-20.
    [9]
    王云,于忠江,张云华,王立岩,柳德书,马岩.密度对天农青饲1号高粱#x000D7;苏丹草杂交种经济性状的影响.中国糖料,2005(2):39-41.
    [9]
    Li Y,Xie N,Zhao H M,Liu G B,Xie J X.Analysis on change pattern of the vegetative growth and forage quality of Sorghum bicolor#x000D7;S. sudanense .Acta Agrestia Sinica,2011,19(5):813-820.(in Chinese)
    [10]
    梅艳,阮培均,赵明勇.不同种植密度和施肥量对乐食高丹草产量的影响.贵州农业科学,2010,38(10):77-79.
    [10]
    He Z F,He C G,Wei Y M,Liu L S.Biological characteristics and nutrients of the photoperiod- sensitive Sorghum#x000D7;Sudangrass varieties in the arid land of east Gansu.Acta Pratacultural Science,2015,24(10):166-174.(in Chinese)
    [11]
    Mu Z L.Effects of planting density and methods on hunnigreen forage sorghum.Journal of Sichuan Grassland,2004(3):27-28.(in Chinese)
    [11]
    李源,赵海明,游永亮,刘贵波,翟兰菊,武瑞鑫.海河低平原区施氮磷肥对高丹草生产性能及饲用品质的影响.草业科学,2017,34(2):369-377.
    [12]
    Packer D J,Rooney W.High-parent heterosis for biomass yield in photoperiod-sensitive sorghum hybrids.Field Crops Research,2014,167:153-158.
    [12]
    Zhang H W,Qin L,Yang Y B,Guan Y A,Wang H L.Effects of sowing density and variety on biological character and yield of sweet sorghum.Shandong Agricultural Sciences,2008(7):13-15.(in Chinese)
    [13]
    Li C X,Dong X C,Li W J,Zhang H G,Chen Z G.Preliminary study on sweet sorghum growing on Qinghai Plateau.Pratacultural Science,2010,27(9):75-81.(in Chinese)
    [13]
    Bean B W,Baumhardt R L,McCollum F T,McCuistion K C.Comparison of sorghum classes for grain and forage yield and forage nutritive value.Field Crops Research, 2013,142:20-26.
    [14]
    李源,谢楠,赵海明,刘贵波,谢俊雪.高丹草营养生长与饲用品质变化规律分析.草地学报,2011,19(5):813-820.
    [15]
    何振富,贺春贵,魏玉明,刘陇生.光敏型高丹草在陇东旱塬的生物学特性和营养成分比较研究.草业学报,2015,24(10):166-174.
    [16]
    Wolabu T W,Zhang F,Niu L F,Kalve S,Bhatnagar M P,Muszynski M G,Tadege M.Three FLOWERING LOCUS T-like genes function as potential florigens and mediate photoperiod response in sorghum.New Phytologist,2016,210:946-959.
    [17]
    Wang Y,Tan L B,Fu Y C,Zhu Z F,Liu F X,Sun C Q,Cai H W.Molecular evolution of the sorghum maturity gene Ma3 .PLoS One,2015,10(5):e0124435.
    [18]
    AOAC.Official Methods of Analysis.13th ed.Washington,DC:Association of Offical Analytical Chemists,1980.
    [19]
    李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术.北京:高等教育出版社,2002.
    [20]
    van Soest P J,Robertson J B,Lewis B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74:3583-3597.
    [21]
    Rohweder D A,Barnes R F,Jorgensen N.Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality.Animal Science,1978,47:747-759.
    [22]
    牟芝兰.种植方式与种植密度对大力士高粱的影响.四川草原,2004(3):27-28.
    [23]
    张华文,秦岭,杨延兵,管延安,王海莲.种植密度和品种对甜高粱生物性状与产量的影响.山东农业科学,2008(7):13-15.
    [24]
    李春喜,董喜存,李文建,张怀刚,陈志国.甜高粱在青海高原种植的初步研究.草业科学,2010,27(9):75-81.
    [25]
    Snider J L,Raper R L,Schwab E B.The effect of row spacing and seeding rate on biomass production and plant stand characteristics of non-irrigated photoperiod-sensitive sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench).Industrial Crops and Products,2012,37(1):527-535.
    [26]
    Van der Werf H M G,Wijlhuizen M,Deschutter J A A.Planting density and self thinning affect yield and quality of fibre hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.).Field Crops Research,1995,40:153-164.
    [27]
    Venuto B,Kindiger B.Forage and biomass feedstock production from hybrid forage sorghum and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids.Grassland Science,2008,54:189-196.
  • Related Articles

    [1]XU Lihua, FU Gang, ZHONG Zhiming. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer levels on the production and nutritive value of forage rye in the Lhasa Dagzê District[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(6): 1592-1599. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0512
    [2]LIU Guiyu, ZHOU Daliang, LIANG Huanhuan, SHI Wei, CHANG Shenghua, JIA Qianmin, HOU Fujiang. Regulation of density and nitrogen fertilizer on physiological characteristics, yield, and quality of silage maize using a ridge-furrow rainfall harvesting system in Longdong Region, China[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2022, 39(5): 960-976. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2021-0374
    [3]SU Yajun, JIAO Ting, WU Jianping, LI Yu, DOU Siyuan, LIU Ting, GONG Xuyin, WANG Jianfu, LEI Zhaomin. Effects of planting density and variety on biomass and nutrient quality of green maize[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(5): 935-946. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2020-0307
    [4]LIU Jinliang, ZHENG Qi, SUN Zhiqiang, LIU Facai, SHI Xiaoying. Comparison of the feeding values of brewing-forage sorghum and grain-forage maize[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(1): 161-168. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2018-0111
    [5]Qi Yan, Shi-ting Zhang, Chang-ming Zhao, Pei-pei Liu, Jiao-jiao Zhang, Yue-hua Wang, Hai-yan Wei, Xian-ju Wang, Shi-qi Lyu, Lu-ming Ding. Evaluation of the nutritional value of silage from stems and leaves of different Jerusalem artichoke varieties in an alpine region[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 12(6): 1568-1573. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0312
    [6]Shan-shan Li, Fei Li, Yan-fu Bai, Zhan-huan Shang. Sweet sorghum feeding value and feeding dairy cows technology[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 11(7): 1534-1541. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2016-0402
    [7]Yuan Li, Hai-ming Zhao, Yong-liang You, Gui-bo Liu, Lan-ju Zhai, Rui-xin Wu. Effects of nitrogen and nhosphate fertilizer application on production performance and forage quality for Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense in Haihe lowland plain[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 11(2): 369-377. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2016-0503
    [8]Xiao-na Zhang, Shu-hong Song, Zhi-fei Chen, Ying Zhang, Yun-gui Yang. Effects of growth stage on yield and quality of leaf and stem[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 10(4): 713-721. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0486
    [9]Jing LI, Ling-ling LI, Li-jian ZHANG, Liang-liang CHEN, Jun-hong XIE. Effects of nitrogen application on yield and forage quality of grain and forage maize[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 9(3): 442-449. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0151
    [10]QIAN Xu, YIN Zuoqian, JIN Hailin, YANG Kecheng, BAI Lou[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2012, 6(2): 327-330.

Catalog

    Article views (1171) PDF downloads (169) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return