Welcome Pratacultural Science,Today is
WANG Y, SHI Y Q, , LIU Y R, NAN Z J, ZHANG Q Z, PAN J B. Combined effect of water and nitrogen application on yield and silage quality of silage maize. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(11): 2247-2254. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2021-0280
Citation: WANG Y, SHI Y Q, , LIU Y R, NAN Z J, ZHANG Q Z, PAN J B. Combined effect of water and nitrogen application on yield and silage quality of silage maize. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(11): 2247-2254. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2021-0280

Combined effect of water and nitrogen application on yield and silage quality of silage maize

  • This research was conducted to investigate the effect of combining water and nitrogen supplementation on yield, nutritional value, and silage quality of silage maize (Zea may, improving its comprehensive utilization value. The silage maize hybrid cultivar Beinong silage 368 was used as experimental material. The experimental design included three water irrigation application rates, i.e., 2 250, 2 025, and 1 800 m3·ha−1 (designated as W1, W2, and W3, respectively), and three nitrogen application rates, i.e., 420, 378, and 336 kg·ha−1 (designated as N1, N2, and N3, respectively). The results showed that the highest yields of silage maize were obtained when W2 and N2 treatments were combined; this yield was 5.02% higher than that obtained with the traditional water and fertilizer application volumes (W1N1). The dry matter loss rate of silage resulting from W1N1, W2N2, or W2N3 treatments was less than 1.0% after a year. However, there were significant differences in neutral and acid detergent fiber content, starch content, and crude ash of whole maize plants between treatments (P < 0.05) but not in ether extract concentration. After the first anniversary, the pH of the maize silage was stable at about 4.0, its relative feed value was 136.04 ~ 164.35, and its lactic and acetic acid contents were 3.33 ~ 4.34% and 1.63% ~ 2.29%, respectively. The lactic acid content resulting from the treatments was higher than that of W1N1, and the acetic acid content resulting from W2N2 and W3N3 treatments was significantly lower than that from other treatments (P < 0.05). In conclusion, considering the yield, dry matter content loss rate, and silage quality, W2N2 was the best treatment for producing high quality silage.
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return